Palawa lawyer questions benefit of Tasmanian constitutional recognition

Australia's island state, Tasmania, is one step closer to recognising Palawa first nations in their constitutional preamble.

Aboriginal flag

Aboriginal flag Source: Getty Images

Legislation acknowledging Aboriginal people in the state's constitution has been passed in Tasmania's Lower House. 

Premier and Minister for Aboriginal Affairs Will Hodgman says the bill seeks to recognise Aboriginal Australians as the state's first people.

But some members of the community are questioning the Government's motives behind the move.
Tasmanian Premier Will Hodgman.
Premier and Minister for Aboriginal Affairs Will Hodgman Source: AAP
Tasmanian Aboriginal lawyer and activist Michael Mansell told NITV News Aboriginal people are unlikely to benefit from the proposed changes. 

"Having a gesture in the Tasmanian constitution will not deliver any practical benefits for Aboriginal people."

"Governments can simply stand up there and make all these high moral statements, but at the same time they can open up the West Coast to four-wheel drives to destroy Aboriginal heritage." 

Mr Mansell says he is disappointed by the lack of community consultation on the issue.
Hardly any Aboriginal people even knew that this parliamentary debate was taking place.
"They should have gone to the people that are the intended beneficiaries of the acknowledgement, the Aboriginal people, and say, 'look, this is what we'd like to do, is that suitable to you?'."
Aboriginal spokesman Michael Mansell at Cape Barren Island
Michael Mansell Source: AAP
Mr Mansell is calling for more community consultation before the legislation is passed in the Upper House. 

"Even if it takes two or three years and we've got to have a lot of negotiations with the white and the black community, that's what has to be done in order to make an occasion truly historic, rather than something that is purely self-indulgent."

The state's Labor Opposition says it supports the recognition of the Palawa first nations in their constitutional preamble, but argued for an adjournment to ensure a full public chamber could mark the occasion.  

The proposed changes will be considered by the Upper House next week.

Share
2 min read
Published 14 October 2016 4:57pm
Updated 20 October 2016 9:42am
By Michelle Rimmer
Source: NITV News


Share this with family and friends